Support 
PLEASE DONATE TODAY!
2010 to date:

We will not be able to continue this work without you ... Please support 911truth.org. Thank you.

 

Please help us clear out our remaining inventory. All items are now at least 50% off; many as low as $1.00. Purchases made by Monday, 9/6 can arrive (in the US) in time for the anniversary via USPS Priority Mail shipping.

Stickers - Wristbands - Deception Dollars
Books - DVDs - Audio CDs

New to 9-11 Research? 
> Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story of September 11th, 2001
> 9/11 Victims' Families' Review of 9/11 Commission Report
> 9-11 Research: An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001 (Outstanding, well- organized, solid research)
> Nanothermite information Why were military-grade explosive chips found in the towers' dust throughout Lower Manhattan? Peer-reviewed paper, more information and summary.
> Beginners' Guide to 9/11 Truth from Journal of 9/11 Studies
> Complete 9/11 Timeline and Loss of Civil Liberties Since 9/11, Searchable database resources from 'mainstream' sources
> A Quick Course on the shortest paths to 9/11 truth...
> Justice For 9/11 Complaint and Petition filed with NY Attorney General Elliot Spitzer November, 2004. The complete legal case, as of that date.
> 9/11 Commission -- One Year Later PDF Report of 7/05 Hearings sponsored by Rep. Cynthia McKinney
> Who's asking questions? ... Patriotsquestion911.com
> Information, disinformation, misinformation... this, this and http://www.rediscover911.org/ will help.
> Mission Statement and Editorial Policy of 911Truth.org
Professionals for 9/11 Truth 
Alternative Media Links 
9/11 NEWS/FORUMS
>911truthnews.com
>911blogger.com
>Truthaction.org Forum >Globalresearch.ca
>RigorousIntuition Forum

NEWSWIRES
>Information Clearinghouse
>Citizens for Legitimate Government
>BoilingFrogsPost.com
dailycensored.com

BLOGS
>George Washington's Blog
>911debunkers.blogspot.com
>Scott Ford
>Mark Crispin Miller--News From Underground Blog
>GlennGreenwald 'Unclaimed Territory'
>Austin Fitts 'Mapping the Real Deal'
>Nafeez Ahmed 'The Cutting Edge'
>BeatTheChip - Stop RealID/PASS

RADIO/AUDIO/VIDEO with associated blogs/articles

electric politics


Blog and Weekly Radio Show

>Guns & Butter ... Investigating capitalism, militarism and politics, Wed., 1pmPacific
>Law and Disorder Radio: The great civil liberties attorney Bill Kunstler saw it coming. "The police state is emerging," he warned. "It's coming piece by piece and at a certain point it will be irreversible."
>Free Speech Radio News
>Global Research News Hour, M-F 10am Central
>Tell Somebody!, Tue., 6pmCentral on KKFI Community Radio



COMIC RELIEF

Comic News

9/11 Movement 
History, strategies, growth
Developing... 
Breaking news & ongoing
stories of special import
In the Media 
When 9/11 truth slips thru
9/11 Consequences 
The downstream battles for
peace, rights and solvency
9/11 Precedents 
How it's done again & again


page   << < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 > of 29 pages, 310 articles

In the Media


BBC2 to air '9/11: The Conspiracy Files' on Feb. 18th

If you're in the U.K. or somehow get BBC2, make sure to watch this and send us your thoughts. The "X-Files" marketing, and referring to this website as "the main conspiracy website" don't necessarily bode well, but on the other hand, BBC2 has done good work before. Our fingers are crossed.
– Ed.

September 11 conspiracies will go mainstream on Sunday as BBC airs an hour long documentary (article below) that investigates the growing number of conspiracy theories surrounding the 9/11 attacks.

9/11: The Conspiracy Files, will try to answer the question that has been doing the rounds on the Internet ever since the hijacked planes crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center: "Is it an inside job?"

According to the BBC, investigators have travelled across the United States speaking to eyewitnesses trying to separate fact from fiction.

The programme produced by Guy Smith raises another important question: "Why was America so unprepared when terror attack warnings had been received?"

According to a Scripps Howard poll, 36% of 1,010 Americans believe that the government is responsible for the attacks either by omission or by commission.

The official 9/11 commission report concluded that "there were specific points of vulnerability in the plot and opportunities to disrupt it.

 

Link TV Airs 9/11: Press for Truth


Program Details

Special: Truth, Lies and the Press - Part 1
Length: 2:00
Type of program: Documentary

Upcoming Airtimes, February 10th through March 10th: Schedule here

 

An overview of C. Ketcham's groundbreaking piece in CounterPunch:
What did Israel Know In Advance of the September 11 Attacks?


Normally, we'd throw caution to the wind, copyright-wise, and reprint an article like this in its entirety, but this particular issue is, thus far, for paying CounterPunch subscribers. We urge you to email or call Counterpunch to see about purchasing this single issue, as it will be a valuable part of any 9/11 library. Meanwhile, we bring you some important chunks.

The running of this story shows how, as the tonnage of evidence begins to weigh on people's minds, the media is creeping into covering the serious 9/11 questions. Many who have publically derided the "truth movement" — like Counterpunch co-editor Alexander Cockburn — now deliver the goods on back roads, or with pretexts that trump their previous diatribes. Had the focus of Christopher Ketcham's article been on Pakistani, rather than Israeli, involvement with 9/11, one has to wonder if CounterPunch would have run it.

 

Manuel Garcia Sees Physics That Don’t Exist

In his latest article, Kevin Ryan exposes Manuel Garcia's Counterpunch trifecta of articles to reality testing. They fail miserably. Garcia's explanations for the collapse of the Twin Towers rest on unsupported speculation and scientific jargon rather than facts. Ryan rightly points out that first NIST, and then Garcia, rely on evidentiary uncertainty to draw untenable conclusions rather than consider an hypothesis that is abhorrent to them. This is not surprising, perhaps, given that NIST is government-funded and Garcia is a US weapons scientist.

Garcia's avoidance of the demolition scenario may also explain his resorting to what Ryan calls "creative guesswork" in attempting to explain the collapse of WTC 7. Whatever the best explanation is for the still-unsatisfactorily explained collapse of WTC 7, Garcia does not advance our understanding in his three-part bit of speculation.

– Ed.

Over the years we've heard from a few educated people who claim to understand and support the latest story given by the US government for the unprecedented destruction of the WTC buildings. Unfortunately, those folks usually turn out to either work for the Bush Administration directly, like FEMA and NIST, or are in some other way profiting from the War on Terror. Some people accept what these Bush scientists say because they have PhDs in scientific fields, or because certain media sources promote the official myths. In a way, the curious behavior of these scientists and media sources allows us to better see the predicament we all face.  

Into the Ring with Counterpunch on 9/11: How Alexander Cockburn, Otherwise So Bright, Blanks Out on 9/11 Evidence

Michael Keefer strikes just the right tone in responding to Alexander Cockburn's attempt to banish "conspiracy nuts" from the kingdom of the left.

Keefer accounts for Cockburn's hostility to conspiracy by locating him in the "class of academics and public intellectuals, for whom a migration of power into military, deep-political, and corporate-media hands may.... be difficult to acknowledge." We'd add that when those intellectuals are wedded to a brand of analysis that cannot satisfactorily account for what they see transpiring before their eyes, that difficulty is only magnified. Slowly but surely, the academic left is coming to understand that the deep politics paradigm offers the most promising analytic tools for understanding the dynamics of geopolitical struggle. Don't be surprised by the discomfort associated with the paradigm shift to continue to produce rhetorically overheated, but substantively lacking, complaints like Cockburn's for quite some time. But really, that's his problem.

– Ed.

Counterpunch co-editor Alexander Cockburn set the tone of these pieces with an article describing theologian and ethicist David Ray Griffin, the author of The New Pearl Harbor (2004) and of The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2005), as a "high priest" of the "conspiracy nuts" whom Cockburn denounces as cultists who "disdain all answers but their own," who "seize on coincidences and force them into sequences they deem to be logical and significant," and who "pounce on imagined clues in documents and photos, [".] contemptuously brush[ing] aside" evidence that contradicts their own "whimsical" treatment of "eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence."

It's a characteristically forceful performance, if at times slipshod. (One small sign of carelessness may be the manner in which Cockburn slides from calling 9/11 skeptics a "coven" to comparing them, a few sentences later, to "mad Inquisitors ["] torturing the data—as the old joke goes about economists—until the data confess." Readers brought up to think that the victims and perpetrators of witch-crazes have not customarily been the same people may find this unintentionally amusing.)

 

Disbelief Regarding The Official 9/11 Story in the U.S.

Here's the latest offering from international media--still asking 9/11 questions while American media instead attacks the questioners--from El Confidencial, of Spain. Also note in our "Upcoming Events" block at the right, a conference to be held in Japan this month.
– Ed.

Over the years people have become increasingly skeptical of official accounts regarding historic events. After the Kennedy assassination everything changed. It is not so much a question of conspiracy theorists using the smallest margin of doubt to support their theories, but rather the increasing loss in prestige of major instutions, and the effect this has had on their credibility. 9/11 is the perfect example of a historic event whose detailed analysis from several different angles produces conclusions different from the official ones. In Spain, there is skepticism over the Madrid bombings of 3/11; in the U.S. - and in the rest of the world - there is skepticism over 9/11.  

Credulity and Its Discontents


If we ever find the time, perhaps we should conduct a group analysis of the hit pieces emanating from the intellectual/academic left against the '9/11 Truth Movement'. Among other similarities, they each exhibit a noteworthy "dual consciousness." In a 1997 interview, the great 20th century sociologist Pierre Bourdieu used the phrase to refer to the mindset of media professionals who publicly deny the insidious workings of the invisible structures of corporate broadcasting - masking it even from themselves to an extent; all the while they take advantage of the media tool at their disposal and denounce their critics, claiming they have uncovered nothing which hasn't been known for ages about the media.  

Hello, South Park Fans!

To those of you who already know that we don't know what happened on 9/11, you're definitely not alone--our Zogby poll in May found 45% of Americans want a new investigation because we know we were lied to! (Final report here). And for a long list of people within the government and military who also know, check out patriotsquestion911.com.

If you're absolutely new to the issue, take a walk through these links and decide for yourself what's true.

For a quick intro to some real information about these questions, we suggest you have a look at the following films online...


– Ed.

 

Enforcers or Enablers? Will the Democrats Become Part of the Problem?

The clear-thinking Paul Craig Roberts shines a spotlight on the most pressing matters confronting Congressional Democrats: first, repeal the ghastly post-9/11 legislation that has been used to hollow out our civil liberties, revoke habeas corpus and justify torture. Second, admit the illegality of our military aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan and make the architects of the policy fully accountable.

Roberts hits the nail on the head in saying, "The notion that Americans can be protected from "terror" by giving up the Bill of Rights is absurd. . . The legislation that has been passed during the Bush regime is far more dangerous to Americans than Muslim terrorists."

We're grateful for his strong voice.

– Ed.

...Republican rule in the 21st century has devastated American civil liberties and American prestige and leadership capability. Can Democrats restore American liberties and leadership, or will a lust for power corrupt them, too, and cause Democrats to retain the police state powers Bush has created?

 

Colorado 9-11 Visibility Events Draw Front Page Story in the Denver Post

Weekend events in Denver and Boulder Colorado proved to be successful on many levels. The events sponsored by Colorado 9-11 Visibility and 911truth.org, 9/11 Research; Why the Official Story Cannot Be True, brought Scholars for 9/11 Truth Steven E. Jones, Kevin Ryan, and Kevin Barrett to town with the aim at bringing heightened awareness and visibility to the 9/11 cover-up. It appears that Colorado 9-11 Visibility has done just that earning a front page story in the Denver Post.
– Ed.

Backers hail 9/11 theorist's speech
By Michael Riley
Denver Post Staff Writer

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_4572518

The standing ovation has finally died down, and Steven E. Jones, a soft-spoken physics professor, finds himself pinned against the stage by some of the enthusiastic fans who packed a University of Denver auditorium over the weekend to see him.

A man with a "Got truth?" T-shirt offers Jones a careful explanation for why the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center were operated by remote control. Another quizzes him about the size of the footprint of the Pentagon crash - too small, he says, for the Boeing 757 that "officially" smashed into it on Sept. 11, 2001.

"Can I just shake your hand?" a woman in a baggy red sweater asks Jones. "You're doing such important work."

 

Americans Question Bush on 9/11 Intelligence


Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research
October 14, 2006

Abstract: - Many adults in the United States believe the current federal government has not been completely forthcoming on the issue of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, according to a poll by the New York Times and CBS News. 53 per cent of respondents think the Bush administration is hiding something, and 28 per cent believe it is lying.

 

page   << < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 > of 29 pages, 310 articles
home   |   about us   |   contact   |   research   |   store   |   grassroots   |   calendar   |   links   |   search   |   email signup