|
Friday, July 31 2009 - Research/Evidence
What Hit the Pentagon? - A new paper at the Journal of 9/11 Studies
by Kevin Ryan July 30, 2009 911blogger.com The Journal of 9/11 Studies has published a new paper by Dr. Frank Legge, entitled "What Hit the Pentagon?", available here: http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2009/WhatHitPentagonDrLegge.pdf Here are some excerpts: "The most logical inference from the Pentagon attack evidence is that the perpetrators of 9/11 knew that there would be many members of the public who would become suspicious for one reason or another. The perpetrators realized that a powerful technique for weakening the arguments of the skeptics would be to have them arguing against one another." "There are two essential points to note: 1. Nothing should have hit the Pentagon. This implies a stand down order existed, as appears to be confirmed by Mineta's testimony to the 9/11 Commission. 2. The authorities could easily show us what hit the Pentagon but they do not."
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article. |
||||
| home | about us | contact | research | grassroots | calendar | links | search |