Friday, March 12 2010 - First Responders/Health Effects
New York Agrees World Trade Center 9/11 Dust Payout
March 12, 2010
New York City officials have agreed to pay up to 657.5m US dollars (437m sterling) to thousands of rescue and clean-up workers after 9/11.
The settlement would compensate more than 10,000 plaintiffs who say they were made sick by dust at the Ground Zero site of the attacks.
At least 95% of the plaintiffs must approve the deal for it to take effect.
The money would come from a federally financed insurance fund of almost $1bn that the city controls.
The toxic cloud from the collapsed World Trade Center towers contained particles of asbestos, lead, glass and cement.
A claims adjudicator, chosen by the lawyers involved in the case, would decide on the validity of each plaintiff's claim and how much compensation they were entitled to.
The agreement follows a long battle in the courts, but must still be approved
by a judge and agreed to by the claimants.
In a statement, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg called the settlement "a fair and reasonable resolution to a complex set of circumstances".
Some workers are expected to receive payments of only a few thousand dollars, while others could be in line to get more than $1m, depending on their injuries.
The BBC's Adam Brookes, in Washington, says the agreement means that the long-running legal battle spawned by the 9/11 attacks may now be drawing to a close.
After the twin towers fell on 11 September 2001, rescuers spent weeks amid the smouldering wreckage and choking dust in Lower Manhattan, but few were adequately insured for such work.
The government set up a special insurance company to handle claims if any of them ended up injured or sick.
The claims came flooding in, many for cancer and respiratory illness caused by dust.
By early 2008, according to government documents, nearly 10,000 law suits had been filed against the insurance company.
But only six claims were paid out.
Lawyers for the city had claimed it did its best to provide respiratory equipment for workers, and challenged some claims as being based on flimsy medical evidence.
Marc Bern, a senior partner with the law firm which negotiated the deal, said: "We are gratified that these heroic men and women who performed their duties without consideration of the health implications will finally receive just compensation for their pain and suffering."
It is thought that the long courts battle has depleted the $1bn fund created by Congress to help insure the city, with the legal bill so far running to more than $200m.
March 12, 2010
More than 10,000 rescue workers affected by dust after 9/11 are eligible for compensation.
New York City is to pay up to $657.5m (£437m) in compensation to rescue and recovery workers affected by dust after the 9/11 attacks.
The settlement would give compensation to more than 10,000 plaintiffs, who say that they became ill because of dust from the destroyed World Trade Centre towers.
Before it can take effect, at least 95 per cent of these plaintiffs must approve the deal. It must also be approved by a judge.
It was announced yesterday evening by the World Trade Centre Captive Insurance Company, a special body established to handle the legal claims of those injured in the clear-up operation.
Most of the money would come from a $1bn (£664m) grant from the federal emergency management agency.
New York mayor, Michael Bloomberg, said that it was "a fair and reasonable resolution to a complex set of circumstances".
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
Fair Use Notice
This page contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political issues relating to alternative views of the 9/11 events, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.