Notice: Use of undefined constant DISCLAIMER - assumed 'DISCLAIMER' in /home1/improba1/public_html/911truth/includes/fair_social.php on line 3
Notice: Use of undefined constant FAIR_USE - assumed 'FAIR_USE' in /home1/improba1/public_html/911truth/includes/fair_social.php on line 10
Sunday, March 21 2010 - First Responders/Health Effects
Judge Rejects 9/11 Health Settlement
Orders Renegotiation of Settlement for People Sickened by Dust from
World Trade Center; Says $657M Insufficient
March 19, 2010
A federal judge on Friday rejected a legal settlement of more than a half-billion
dollars for people sickened by ash and dust from the World Trade Center, saying
the deal to compensate 10,000 police officers, firefighters and other laborers
didn't contain enough money for the workers.
"In my judgment, this settlement is not enough," said U.S. District Judge Alvin
The judge also said he was concerned too much of the deal would be eaten up
by legal fees and that ground zero responders were going to be pressured into
signing on before they knew how much they stood to receive.
CBSNews.com: In 9/11's Wake, Anguish and Anger
Ground Zero Health Crisis
Section: September 11, 2001 - Eight Years Later
The settlement proposal would have given the workers $575 million to $657 million,
but each person's amount was based on a complicated point system that would
give some workers only a few thousand dollars while others might qualify for
$1 million or more.
A third or more of the amount set aside for the workers was expected to go to
their lawyers. Some plaintiffs had agreed at the start of the case to give as
much as 40 percent of any judgment to cover fees and expenses.
Voices of Sick 9/11 Responders
Cancer Kills 9/11 Firefighter
Under the terms of the deal, workers were given just 90 days to decide whether
they wanted to participate — a time Hellerstein suggested was too short to figure out one of the most important decisions of their lives.
"I will not preside over a settlement that is based on fear or ignorance," he said.
Hellerstein, who presides over all federal court litigation related to the terror attacks, ripped into the agreement after hearing from several ground zero responders speak tearfully of their illnesses, and receiving letters and phone calls from others expressing confusion about the deal.
It wasn't immediately clear whether the judge's actions, which he announced from the bench, would kill the settlement entirely.
The deal had taken years to negotiate and was announced last Thursday, with about two months to go until the first trials.
Watch: Doctor Discusses Ground Zero Health Issues
Photos: NYPD Deaths Linked to 9/11
Last Friday, a representative of one victims' group expressed reservations that deal doesn't contain enough cash.
"From what I've seen, I don't think you're going to get 95 percent of the people to opt in," said John Feal of the Long Island-based FealGood Foundation. He noted that some workers could wind up getting only a few thousand dollars for illnesses that will bother them for life.
"This is far from fair," he said. "Look, if you've got cancer and are going through chemo and medical bills, $1 million goes pretty fast."
The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content,
and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will
not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements
contained in this article.
Fair Use Notice
This page contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political
issues relating to alternative views of the 9/11 events, etc. We believe
this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
"fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.