Monday, April 25 2011 - First Responders/Health Effects
Shame on Representative Cliff Stearns and shame on each and every one of the representatives who voted to make compensation for 9/11 first responders reliant upon a check for "terrorist" activities. Shame is a concept that blankets American actions as it responded to that grave day. I won't belabor the many instances where this nation either killed or maimed others either in retribution or in the pretense at keeping the rest of us "safe" but I will say that this last act of betrayal by elected officials places all of us in greater danger. Frankly, if we don't counter this betrayal, we deserve what we get.
What has come over us? Have we completely lost the ability to function as compassionate adults in an imperfect world? Think for one minute about the ramifications of such an act:
On 9/11/2001 when many people fled the horror of the scene at Ground Zero, countless firefighters, police officers, and brave civilian volunteers rushed to the scene to help. I believe that my own daughter who was on that day four or five months pregnant was almost home free precisely because others helped her almost, almost to safety. How many others walked away because they were provided help? We can only guess at the numbers. How many families of first responders are like my own -- ten years out still suffering the effects of PTSD? We will never be whole again.
And now, before the government hands over fair compensation, compensation provided ten years post what would have been considered justice, this final slap. You must prove you were not a perpetrator of the horror in order to get what you justly deserve at the very minimum. Had these folks asked the same of their own government prior to that day, more would have died.
Imagine that this is the message we send to future people with an impulse toward compassion. Imagine what we teach our future generations about the value of service.
Those in need of this compensation may indeed be living less than stellar lives. They may be terrorists. They may be criminals. They may be serial killers, perverts, child abusers, pick your demon. Who the hell are you? There may indeed be abuses of any system. This will not prevent those abuses. This is a rhetorical move to once again pad political careers by keeping the citizenry at war. Shame on all of you.
On that day America needed the help of our first responders. On that day and for months after, they provided that help at great cost to their own futures. To be sure we will need the help of others again. In a world so stingy with trust, compassion and dignity, we surely will have much more violence and next time, they may think twice.
We throw the term hero at sports figures. We deny that stature to those who really serve. I am ashamed that you think you represent me.
by Michael McAuliff
WASHINGTON -- A provision in the new 9/11 health bill may be adding insult to injury for people who fell sick after their service in the aftermath of the 2001 Al Qaeda attacks, The Huffington Post has learned.
The tens of thousands of cops, firefighters, construction workers and others who survived the worst terrorist assault in U.S. history and risked their lives in its wake will soon be informed that their names must be run through the FBI's terrorism watch list, according to a letter obtained by HuffPost.
Any of the responders who are not compared to the database of suspected terrorists would be barred from getting treatment for the numerous, worsening ailments that the James Zadroga 9/11 Health And Compensation Law was passed to address.
It's a requirement that was tacked onto the law during the bitter debates over it last year.
The letter from Dr. John Howard, director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, informs medical providers and administrators that they should begin letting patients know before the new program kicks in this July.
"This is absurd," said Glen Kline, a former NYPD emergency services officer. "It's silly. It's stupid. It's asinine."
"It's comical at best, and I think it's an insult to everyone
who worked on The Pile and is sick and suffering from 9/11," said John
Feal, a former construction worker who lost half a foot at Ground Zero and runs
the advocacy group Fealgood Foundation.
The provision was added in an amendment by Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) during the heated debate over the bill in the House Energy and Commerce Committee last May.
Sept. 11 responders in the committee room at the time mostly shook their heads at the move, which Democrats accepted on a voice vote after battling to bar other amendments on abortion and immigration that might have killed the bill.
But suddenly the point is no longer just a strategic concession to get a law passed.
As doctors and administrators begin acting on the federal instructions, participants in the 9/11 treatment and monitoring programs will soon be told that their names, places of birth, addresses, government ID numbers and other personal data will be provided to the FBI to ensure they are not terrorists.
Howard's instructions include a sample letter to responders designed to minimize alarm.
"Although neither we nor [the Centers for Disease Control]/NIOSH anticipate the name of any individual in the current Programs will be on the list, CDC/NIOSH is expressly required by law to implement this particular requirement of the Act," it says.
"Thank you for your understanding. We look forward to working with you and ensuring that you continue to receive uninterrupted services under the new WTC Health Program," it concludes.
Feal, who counts hundreds of first responders in his foundation's membership, predicted the letters would not go over well.
"When cops and firefighters get this at home, they're going to hit the roof," he said.
Kline, who sits on the Fealgood Foundation's board, said he personally wasn't offended, but couldn't think of a good reason for cops and firefighters to be screened by the FBI in order to keep getting treatment.
"I mean, who are we even talking about -- the undocumented workers who cleaned the office buildings?" wondered Kline Thursday. "We know who all the cops, firefighters and construction workers were. They're all documented.
"Is the idea that a terrorist stayed to help clean up? And then stayed all these years to try and get benefits?" he asked. "In all the things I've seen out of Washington, this probably takes the cake."
Some are more understanding.
"Do we want terrorists getting money? No," said Anthony Flammia, a former NYPD Highway Patrol officer and Sept. 11 responder. "How do you know if there were any terrorists there? Were they there as observers, watching? Probably."
But he noted that his perspective likely would not be shared, especially if people whose names are similar to actual terror suspects get flagged, as happens with air travelers.
"I've got nothing to hide, so it's no big deal for me, but there's got to be safeguards in place to protect the people who are innocent," Flammia said. "It's going to be controversial," he added. "It's probably going to create an uproar, but I think it will dissipate. I hope they're ready to answer people's questions."
Congressman Stearns said in a statement that his intent was to answer exactly the questions raised by Flammia.
"This amendment was adopted in the full Energy and Commerce Committee without opposition and it merely requires that the names of those receiving health benefits be cross-checked with the terrorist watch list to ensure that no terrorists get these benefits," Stearns said.
"These benefits are not just for our first responders; nearly anyone who was in the vicinity or worked on a cleanup crew afterward is eligible," he noted.
The prohibition is included in two parts of the bill. One specifically covers responders, while the other deals with all survivors, including office workers, bystanders and residents.
Feal acknowledged that the terrorist screening has to be done because it is the law, and that the letters have to go out.
But he holds Stearns responsible, as well as several other Republicans who were hostile to the 9/11 bill, and tried to tack all manner of amendments onto it.
"I think Congressman Stearns is stabbing at pettiness. He's a buffoon," Feal said. "We get sicker and die, and they're going to disseminate a letter wondering whether we're terrorists or not. ... I think everybody needs to start showing a little more compassion."
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
Fair Use Notice
This page contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political issues relating to alternative views of the 9/11 events, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.