Dangerous New Bill Would Expand the Patriot Act

700

The House of Representatives will consider a dangerous bill under suspension of the rules (a procedure to quickly pass supposedly non-controversial bills) on Wednesday. Known as the Empowering Financial Institutions to Fight Human Trafficking Act of 2018 (HR6729), the bill would expand Patriot Act surveillance and increase Suspicious Activity Reporting.

HR 6729 would create a new structure for non-profits to report ‘suspicious’ activity related to human trafficking to banks and other financial institutions, but clears them of any liability for reporting information they know to be false or even purposefully malicious, or motivated by racial, ethnic, religious animus, or for personal, political, or financial gain. The process would increase the number of Suspicious Activity Reports filed by banks (already over a million each year), and the bill does not include any process for individuals (who may have been wrongly accused) to defend themselves or appeal. Always risk averse, banks would be inclined to close accounts and refuse to do business with anyone or any organization reported to them as suspicious.

Info graphic of Surveillance under the Patriot ActThe bill also gives the Treasury Department authority to create new regulations on information sharing that could expand warrantless surveillance under Section 314 of the Patriot Act (something Treasury has tried to do repeatedly). The information sharing would not be limited to human trafficking, but any suspected unlawful activities.

Along with FreedomWorks, the Due Process Institute, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, DRAD sent a letter urging a ‘no’ vote and outlining some of our concerns.

We also joined with the ACLU, Color of Change, Demand Progress and other groups on another letter:

We urge you to vote ​against​ H.R. 6729 when the measure is considered later this week.​ The legislation would allow the Treasury Department to expand the surveillance and sharing of Americans’ financial records beyond what is provided for by the USA PATRIOT Act. The government has previously sought and Congress has rightly voted to reject such an expansion. Similar legislation in the 114th Congress, H.R. 5606, drew opposition from 177 members and failed on a suspension vote.

The legislation has broad applicability and significantly harmful effects that go far beyond its stated purpose of allowing financial institutions to combat human trafficking.

H.R. 6729 contains an overly broad provision ​that prohibits Treasury from requiring nonprofit organizations to show that they are sharing information in good faith and preempts liability for organizations under privacy laws. While the measure is described as allowing nonprofits to report suspicions of human trafficking or money laundering to financial institutions, it risks our privacy and raises concerns about the misuse of information.

In addition, H.R. 6729 allows a wide range of institutions to communicate with each other about “suspicious” activities regardless of the basis for the suspicion and despite other applicable laws and consumer agreements​. The concerns need not be rooted in reality. Moreover, the safe harbor provision does not merely encompass traditional financial institutions like banks and financial services providers, but extends more broadly. This legislation also fails to establish any legal recourse for negligent or malicious acts.

H.R. 6729 would create the risk of financial institutions closing accounts of people they deem too risky to do business with on the basis of meritless or otherwise unsupported claims from nonprofit organizations. ​Every financial institution already has a legal obligation to file a “Suspicious Activity Report” with the government whenever it “knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect that an individual, entity, or organization is involved in or may be involved in terrorist activity or money laundering.” It is an unfortunate fact that suspicions and accusations can be based on or motivated by personal, political, ethnic, racial, cultural, or religious animus. It is unacceptable to expand the scope of entities that can submit this information in a process that is broadly immunized from legal recourse.

This legislation goes far beyond the goal of combating human trafficking and significantly expands governmental surveillance, the impact of which falls most heavily and relentlessly on those who are the least able to defend themselves. Now is not the time to rush this legislation, introduced a mere two weeks ago, through a legislative procedure intended for uncontroversial bills.

Sincerely yours,

American Civil Liberties Union

American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee

Color Of Change

Defending Rights & Dissent

Demand Progress Action

Free Press Action

Freedom of the Press Foundation

Government Information Watch

New America’s Open Technology Institute

Project On Government Oversight

X-Lab