|
Wednesday, May 20 2009 - Get Involved
Lecture at Sydney University - "The Life and Death of World Trade Centre One"Dr. David Leifer - http://www.arch.usyd.edu.au/staff/homepage/davidleifer.shtml When: 6:30pm, Thursday the 4th of June 2009 Dr. David Leifer, Architect and Senior Lecturer at Sydney University continues to question the veracity of the "official explanation" of the WTC collapses on September 11th 2009. In this lecture on Thursday the 4th of June, Dr. Leifer will uncover what is most probable, not what is politically correct about the collapse of WTC 1 that was impacted by Flight 11 on 9/11. It is worth remembering that three Sydney residents died in WTC 1; Alberto Dominguez on Flight 11 and both Craig Neil Gibson and Steve Tompsett, working in the building. There is no doubt this issue is relevant to us in Sydney and we hope more academics in Sydney and Australia join Dr. Leifer in serious research of these murders.
Wednesday, May 20 2009 - 9/11 A/V Galleries
9/11: Blueprint for Truth - WTC Building 7 - 10 minutes9/11: Blueprint for Truth - WTC Building 7 - 10 minutes - from the new AE911Truth “Companion” Edition DVD This is one of the three abridged videos on the new AE911Truth Companion Edition to "9/11: Blueprint for Truth -- The Architecture of Destruction" DVD. In just 10 minutes Richard Gage, AIA of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth takes you through most of the scientific forensic evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the destruction of WTC 7 was accomplished with explosive controlled demolition. This DVD is available at the AE911Truth online store, packaged together along with the 30 and 60 minute versions of 9/11: Blueprint for Truth. See the extended 2 hour Research Edition for the complete array of evidence and background information! Visit www.ae911truth.org for further details.
Tuesday, May 19 2009 - Other Important News
Official story of 9/11 "almost entirely untrue"5/19/09 UPDATE: Following is an interesting note posted by Reprehensor at 911blogger.com about the situation at Daily Kos following the posting of this diary entry, "Official story of 9/11 'almost entirely untrue'," which has received over 1,000 comments since being posted. It seems a very popular member there has been banned for posting a note addressing one of the core problems in America, and indeed for the truth movement. As time goes on, rather than looking more clearly at history to learn from it, truth becomes more clearly "banned" from popular culture. Bravo to this person for pointing out the obvious in spite of "the rules."
From Reprehensor: Following the posting of Inky99's blog entry, Official story of 9/11 "almost entirely untrue", a follow-up blog was posted by longtime site user, Tocquedeville, entitled, The Conspiracy Theorist Label. Despite Tocquedeville's popularity on the site, he was banned, merely for pointing out the obvious;
Although Tocquedeville ultimately relies on the blowback hypothesis, his opening comment is 100% valid, and true. Now, user Bidet has posted this; Daily Kos diarist, Tocquedeville, has been banned. This diary is a petition to get him unbanned. Inky99's blog garnered over 1000 comments, the same as Tocquedeville's diary. However, the diary entry calling for the reinstatement of Tocquedeville has collected over 2500 comments as of 0622 Central Time today, and the poll has over 8200 votes, with a 2 to 1 majority asking for the unbanning of Tocquedeville. I haven't posted anything at Kos in over a year, but when I posted a poll along with Dem Bruce Lee Styles' video, here, I got a nearly 7 to 1 positive response for asking this simple question; "Was 9/11 adequately investigated?" It's been nearly 3 years since Kos put his policy in place, which is apparently completely out of step with his own user base. Perhaps, with enough vocal, logical, powerful participation on Kos, he will re-think his policy. I doubt it, but it's the "Hope and Change" era, is it not? – Ed.
by Inky99 May 16, 2009 dailykos.com The State of the Nation blog Now, before you get your panties in a bunch, this is about a new book, titled "The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America's Defense on 9/11". And before you get all outraged (The FAQ! The FAQ!), here is the author of the book, John Farmer:
Monday, May 18 2009 - Get Involved
Annie Machon Lecture tour 2009 Annie Machon Lecture tour 2009 MI5 whistle blower and 9/11 truth activist Annie Machon will be traveling across Canada spreading the good word in late May, 2009. Cambridge educated, blonde and beautiful, Annie Machon was MI5's dream recruit... until she blew the whistle on them for all their crimes. Machon will be telling us her story, the story of MI5's bungling, add a few choice episodes from our ow illustrious CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service ) -- the Canadian counterpart to MI5 -- and tie it all in to 9/11 and the history of false flag terrorism. Read an interview with Annie Machon Annie Machon, ex-agent du MI5, à Montréal le 28 mai! Dénonciatrice du MI5 et activiste pour la vérité sur le 11 septembre, Annie Machon traversera le Canada afin de répendre la bonne nouvelle à la fin mai 2009. Éduquée à Cambridge, blonde et belle, Annie Machon était la recrue parfaite du MI5... jusqu'à ce qu'elle les dénonce pour tous leurs crimes. Annie Machon nous parlera de son histoire, l'histoire d'un MI5 maladroit, ajoutera quelques épisodes de notre illustre SCRS (Service canadien du renseignement de sécurité) -- la contre-partie canadienne du MI5 -- et fera les liens avec le 11 septembre et l'histoire des opérations terroristes false flag.
Monday, May 18 2009 - Research/Evidence
Rob Kall interviews Sibel EdmondsPosted at 911blogger.com by Loose Nuke Rob Kall Headlined Lukery's transcript: See either link for hyperlinks- as Lukery says, Rob's radio show gets archived here, but they're only up to 3/18/09: PS- recent, related article by Lukery: They spy on judges, too. http://letsibeledmondsspeak.blogspot.com/2009/05/rob-kall-interviews-sib...
Monday, May 18 2009 - Research/Evidence
Dr. Frank Legge, two new papers at the Journal of 9/11 StudiesAnnouncing two new papers by Dr. Frank Legge (Ph.D., Chemistry) published at journalof911studies.com: 1) "Controlled Demolition at the WTC: an Historical Examination of the Case" provides a brief history of research related to explosive demolition at the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001, from Dr. Legge's point of view. Cogent and pithy; worth the read. http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2009/LeggeCDatWTC.pdf 2) "Frank Greening versus Isaac Newton" provides a brief expose of the "lapse" by F. Greening in understanding Newton's Third Law -- and the significance of this gaffe by Greening. Sometimes humorous, certainly enlightening. http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2009/FGvsNewton.pdf
Saturday, May 16 2009 - Truth Movement News
9-11 Conspiracy Theorists Sue St. LouisBy JOE HARRIS May 12, 2009 Courthouse News Service
ST. LOUIS (CN) - Two 9-11 conspiracy theorists say St. Louis used an unconstitutional ordinance to violate their right to free speech. Donald Stahl and William Demsar say city police arrested them on Feb. 6 for carrying a banner that stated, "911 Was An Inside Job!"In their federal claim, the men say it was a peaceful protest calling for a new, independent investigation into the federal government's involvement into the events of September 11, 2001. The men say they were not blocking pedestrian or vehicular traffic. They say police arrested them and destroyed their sign based on an ordinance that states: "No person shall sell or offer for sale any goods or merchandise, display any sign or pictures, participate in or conduct an exhibition or demonstration, talk, sing or play music on any street or abutting premises, or alley in consequences of which there is such a gathering of persons or stopping of vehicles as to impede either pedestrians or vehicular traffic."
Friday, May 15 2009 - Research/Evidence
9/11: Time for a Second LookAmong independent scientists and professionals in the relevant fields who have studied the evidence, the weight of scientific and professional opinion is now overwhelmingly on the side of the 9/11 Truth Movement. Whereas well over 1,000 such people have gone on record publicly questioning the official theory, there are virtually no scientists or professionals in the relevant fields who have gone on record in support of the official story--except for such people who are not independent, meaning that their whose livelihoods would be threatened if they refused to support the official theory. This caveat is important, because, as Sinclair Lewis famously observed: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." Except for such people, virtually everyone who has expertise in a relevant field, and who has seriously studied the evidence, rejects the official conspiracy theory. It is time, therefore, for journalists and everyone else to take a second look. by David Ray Griffin My lecture is entitled "9/11: Time for a Second Look." In suggesting that it is time for people to take a second look at 9/11, I have in mind primarily people who decided long ago that the attacks of 9/11 happened essentially the way the Bush-Cheney administration and the official reports about 9/11 said they happened, and who therefore decided that the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement, which disputes that account, is comprised of crazy conspiracy theorists with no capacity to evaluate evidence objectively. Having formed these views long ago, such people, including most journalists, have been impervious to any arguments presented by the Truth Movement. They simply roll their eyes and move on.
Thursday, May 14 2009 - 9/11 A/V Galleries
David Ray Griffin & Niels Harrit: 9/11: Time for a second look in LucerneText of Dr. Griffin's speech will be available here tomorrow.
– Ed.
alles-schallundrauch.blogspot.com
(Also in German, below)
Thursday, May 14 2009 - 9/11 Commission
Report: much of 9/11 CommissionBy Stephen C. Webster Much of the material cited in the 9/11 Commission's findings was derived from terror war detainees during brutal CIA interrogations authorized by the Bush administration, according to a Wednesday report. "More than one-quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations of al Qaeda operatives subjected to the now-controversial interrogation techniques," writes former NBC producer Robert Windrem in The Daily Beast. "In fact, information derived from the interrogations was central to the 9/11 Report’s most critical chapters, those on the planning and execution of the attacks." "... [Information] derived from the interrogations is central to the Report’s most critical chapters, those on the planning and execution of the attacks," reported NBC. "The analysis also shows - and agency and commission staffers concur - there was a separate, second round of interrogations in early 2004, done specifically to answer new questions from the Commission.
Thursday, May 14 2009 - 9/11 Commission
Pelosi the EnablerShould the members of the 9/11 Presidential Commission not have been informed that two of the "key witnesses" upon whom their report was based had provided the information critical to the report's conclusions only after being waterboarded a total of 266 times? ... In short, the basic narrative of the origins and conduct of the 9/11 attack that so fundamentally perverted American politics relied on cherry-picked information that the White House and its operative in the field chose to release to the commission. May 12, 2009
Tuesday, May 12 2009 - Other Important News
CIA and ISI together created Taliban: Zardari11 May 2009 Lalit K Jha "I think it was part of your past and our past, and the ISI and CIA created them together," Zardari told the NBC news channel in an interview. In the interview, which was given to the NBC on May 7, Zardari also accused the US of supporting the military rule of Pervez Musharraf who was alleged to be taking sides of the Taliban.
Tuesday, May 12 2009 - Other Important News
Pakistan President: Osama bin Laden was US operator destabilising BenazirBy Arun Kumar Thaindian, as reprinted at Information Clearinghouse with Meet the Press clip May 11, 2009 "New Karala" -- Washington, May 11: Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari has alleged that elusive Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was a US operator who had tried to destabilise his late wife Benazir Bhutto's government back in 1989. Meet the Press transcript here. In fact, as premier Bhutto had "warned America about Osama bin Laden in 1989 with a call to then US president George H. Bush", Zardari said on NBC's Meet the Press programme Sunday.
Tuesday, May 12 2009 - Get Involved
9/11 Survivor Janette MacKinlay - Please Support NYC CANIn this brief video, 9/11 survivor Janette MacKinlay makes an appeal to join New York City Council for Accountability Now in calling for a new investigation into September 11, 2001. Please forward this, and ask others to support this critically important effort.
Tuesday, May 12 2009 - 9/11 Consequences
Alleged 9/11 Mastermind: 'I Gave A Lot Of False Information...'Those who have actually read the 9/11 Commission Report are well aware that the findings, and following recommendations, were significantly based on "intelligence" gathered from men like Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, alleged mastermind of 9/11. Now that we undeniably know this "intelligence" was indeed based on false confessions, desperately concocted to make the torture stop (KSM was waterboarded 183 times in ONE MONTH, for example), isn't it finally time to truly investigate and PROSECUTE the crimes of 9/11? And if the entire substance of "justification" to invade and destroy Iraq was based on false allegations made by Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi in order to keep from being buried alive, isn't it time to truly prosecute the case for murder put forward by Vincent Bugliosi?
– Ed.
May 11, 2009 The Red Cross is the organization charged with deciding what is torture and what isn't. The International Committee of the Red Cross interviewed Khalid Shaikh Mohammed - the alleged 9/11 mastermind - at Guantanamo Bay. Here's what KSM told the Red Cross (see below for more from a review of this report):
Straight from the horse's mouth:
|
||||||
| home | about us | contact | research | grassroots | calendar | links | search |