Saturday, April 4 2009 - Research/Evidence
Another Peer Reviewed Paper Published in Scientific Journal - 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust...'
Please Digg and Reddit and post on other community sites. Steve Jones has been commenting further at 911blogger.com and asking for scientifically-based comments to be added there. If you are not already registered user at 911blogger.com, contact the site editor here.In addition, Jones and Ryan have been interviewed by Michael Wolsey at Visibility911.com -- links follow.
April 3, 2009
The paper ends with this sentence: “Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”
In short, the paper explodes the official story that “no evidence” exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings.
Friday, April 3 2009 - First Responders/Health Effects
A Tribute To John Feal
by Jon Gold
Yesterday, John Feal, along with several other 9/11 First Responders went down to Washington D.C. to attend the hearing on the James Zadroga 9/11 Health And Compensation Act. From what I understand, he was singled out by the Congressmen, and applauded for his efforts. I want to say congratulations John. Just to give people an idea of how much you've fought for the responders, here's a little tribute to you (that barely covers your fight). Thank you for doing the right thing. I am very proud to say that you are my friend.
The EPA is a “bunch of brainiacs and bookworms who just look at numbers but don’t look at people’s pain,” said John Feal, a construction worker who lost half a foot in an accident while working in “the pit” at Ground Zero. “The people [downtown] and in Brooklyn pay taxes and deserve to know their tax money is going to protect their health.”
John Feal - [NYMetro, 12/13/2005]
Friday, April 3 2009 - Truth Movement News
London Truth Action & We Are Change London at the G20 Meltdown (April 1st)
by Gareth Newnham
[David Ray Griffin will be speaking London on April 14 2009 - Details at http://timeforasecondlook.com/tour/]
London Truth Action and We Are Change London were at the G20 protest in the City of London yesterday raising awareness.
Look out for musicians Billy Bragg, Kate Nash, Sam Duckworth (Get Cape, Wear Cape, Fly) and Olly the Octopus using our PA system and impromptu stage - the Bank of England. We also chatted to and exchanged contact details with actor and comedian Russell Brand. [Slide show follows.]
Friday, April 3 2009 - In the Media
Colbert weeps for Glenn Beck's sanity
See also, at Huffington Post, "Colbert Went Where the New York Times Feared to Tread on Glenn Beck" by Greg Mitchell. "Colbert, as you will read and see following this link, expressed (albeit with his usual twinkle and silly Halloween coda) all of the passion, and skill, shown by Stewart when he went after Cramer. He was not just foolin' around. ... Something obviously got to him. Perhaps it was a part left out of the Times' piece, which covered Beck's new "9/12" movement without mentioning that Beck had attacked 9/11 families and said he was sick of hearing about it and them. The punch line: "The 9-12 project is not for families directly affected by 9/11 -- just people building their careers on it." (emphasis added)
By David Edwards and Muriel Kane
April 1, 2009
Glenn Beck of Fox News astonished many viewers recently when he repeatedly reduced himself to tears while announcing his "9.12 Project" to save the nation.
Thursday, April 2 2009 - Truth Movement News
Clearing Clutter thanks to 9/11 Truth with Dr Beeth in Brussels, Belgium
March 30, 2009
This last week-end of March, I had decided to hold a "9/11 Truth Garage Sale" to make a Spring clean in my Brussels house. As my twins grew into teens, you can imagine that I gradually assembled quite a lot of clutter.
A "9/11 Truth Garage Sale" is an excellent way to learn to know one's neighbors better. The 9/11 Truth theme allows you to easily start talking about the important issues surrounding what really happened on September 11th 2001.
Already a member of Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, I felt a surge of excitement at the idea of inviting (together with www.vigli.org) Prof David Ray Griffin to come to speak in Brussels. The last time we had this much fun, was when we had Richard Gage over in November 2008 : read more here.) (Details of Dr. Griffin's European tour are posted at timeforasecondlook.com.)
Always looking for ways to break the ice on the subject of 9/11 Truth, and needing to publicize DRG's conference which hopes to greet more than 600 paying citizens, I put in an ad for a "9/11 Truth Garage Sale" in the local English speaking weekly paper.
Thursday, April 2 2009 - 9/11 A/V Galleries
Leahy Bails on 'Truth Commission' Plan
ConsortiumNews Editor's Note: The U.S. government seems paralyzed at the prospect of holding ex-President George W. Bush and other senior officials accountable for war crimes, even as Spanish investigative judge Baltasar Garzon initiates an inquiry under international law regarding torture sanctioned by Bush's lawyers. In this guest essay, investigative journalist and former candidate for Vermont attorney general, Charlotte Dennett, describes a meeting with Sen. Patrick Leahy in which he acknowledges the failure of his plan for a "truth commission":
By Charlotte Dennett
Those of you following the George W. Bush prosecution trail will be interested to know that Patrick Leahy's "truth commission" is a no-go. I was in a meeting with Leahy and four other Vermonters on Monday when he broke the news to us.
We had asked for the meeting to learn why he supported a truth commission over the appointment of a special prosecutor.
Halfway through the allotted 30 minute meeting (with him taking up much of
the time explaining why he was not generally opposed to prosecution, since he
had been a DA for eight years and had the highest conviction rate in Vermont),
he told us that his truth commission had failed to get the broad support it
needed in Congress, and since he couldn't get one Republican to come behind
the plan, "it's not going to happen."
Thursday, April 2 2009 - Other Important News
Darkness Renewed: Terror as a Tool of Empire
April 1, 2009
By Chris Floyd
Empire Burlesque - Chris-floyd.com
Here's a purely hypothetical scenario. Let's say you were a dedicated imperial militarist who believed that your country's security, prestige and financial interests could best be served by war and the ever-present threat of war. Let's say you had some really hot and juicy operations going on, endless deadly conflicts that were pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into your war machine and entrenching national policy even more deeply in the militarist philosophy – the machtpolitik – that you believe in.
Wednesday, April 1 2009 - First Responders/Health Effects
Update on 9/11 Responders Bill--Two articles, two assessments
We posted an action item on Monday, asking readers to make a 5-minute phone call to your legislators asking them to support H.R. 847, the 9/11 responders health bill that will finally make funding available to responders developing serious illnesses long after 9/11. Now, the bill's sponsors say it's likely to pass because "some" Republicans will support it, while another NY Daily News reporter notes GOP Representatives are saying it's "too late" to get these people money... So what are we to make of that? Republicans hate first responders? Outrageous... Make that call right now. There are sick responders on the registry in every state (See Rep. Maloney's site for this info), meaning some of their own constituents need help--SHAME on Republican legislators who refuse to help people widely regarded as real American heroes, people who dropped everything on 9/11 and got themselves to NYC, from across the entire country, simply to help people they didn't know. Outrageous!
Pols: 9/11 workers likely to get health help
BY Tom Brune
WASHINGTON -- Sponsors of a bill to compensate and cover health care costs of ailing 9/11 responders and recovery workers predicted Tuesday the House would pass the long-pending legislation this year.
It's too late: GOP tells 9/11's sick that it's been too long since the attack for compensation
March 31, 2009
Some Republicans objected that the time frame was too long, and suggested it would be subject to abuse. They also feared creating a semi-permanent fund for victims of the terror attacks would open a precedent that would require similar funds.
Wednesday, April 1 2009 - Other Important News
Hersh: Cheney ‘Left A Stay Behind’ In Obama’s Government, Can ‘Still Control Policy Up To A Point’
In two interviews with Seymour Hersh on March 31st -- Fresh Air with Terry Gross and Democracy Now! with Amy Goodman -- he shared a little bit on what he perceives is going on within the new White House ... and how much influence Cheney still has.
. . . "Are you saying that you think Vice President Cheney is still having a chilling effect on people who might otherwise be coming forward," asked Gross. "I'll make it worse," answered Hersh, adding that he believes Cheney "put people back" in government to "stay behind" in order to "tell him what's going on" and perhaps even "do sabotage":
HERSH: I'll make it worse. I think he's put people left. He's put people back. They call it a stay behind. It's sort of an intelligence term of art. When you leave a country and, you know, you've driven out the, you know, you've lost the war. You leave people behind. It's a stay behind that you can continue to contacts with, to do sabotage, whatever you want to do. Cheney's left a stay behind. He's got people in a lot of agencies that still tell him what's going on. Particularly in defense, obviously. Also in the NSA, there's still people that talk to him. He still knows what's going on. Can he still control policy up to a point? Probably up to a point, a minor point. But he's still there. He's still a presence.
Tuesday, March 31 2009 - Truth Movement News
9/11: Time for a Second Look - David Ray Griffin begins US/European Tour
Professor David Ray Griffin, renowned author of a series of eye-opening books that recount his painstaking research into the attacks of September 11, 2001, begins his new European tour in London on 14th April. Stressing the fact that the time has come for a second look at the events of that fateful day, the tour will include stops in Paris, Brussels and Madrid, and several other cities.
Professor Griffin's talks will afford the public an excellent opportunity to learn more about the fundamental questions surrounding 9/11. The 9/11 Truth Movement, which started out as a disparate, grass-roots undertaking, has blossomed into a serious community that now includes many specialized branches, such as Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Veterans for 9/11 Truth, and Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice (a group which includes a significant number of prominent scientists). Many former intelligence officers also support the movement and have contributed to the ever-growing list of evidence that proves far beyond a reasonable doubt that the explanations provided by the Bush-Cheney administration are quite simply false.
Monday, March 30 2009 - First Responders/Health Effects
5-minute Phone Call for Responders Needed Today
On February 11, 2009, 911truth.org posted notice "9/11 Health Bill Reintroduced in Congress--CALL NOW," including this intro:
Rep. Maloney has posted a very useful link at her House website: World Trade Center Health Registry--Number of Registrants by State and Congressional District based on June 2007 current addresses. When you call your Representative to ask him/her to cosponsor H.R. 847, you might mention the number of first responders from your district, and your state, listed on the Health Registry. All 50 states are included. Maloney states, "...at least 10,000 people came from around the country to help in the aftermath of the attacks." Clearly, this is a national issue and we challenge ANY Representative to give a valid reason why s/he should not support a bill that provides needed care, especially for their own constituents!
TODAY, we appeal to you to do this again, now. FealGood Foundation members and supporters will travel to Washington DC tomorrow to attend a markup hearing on this bill, and your support will make a huge difference in the response they get. At this point, the number of Cosponsors of HR847 has grown to 55 (list of cosponsors can be found at http://thomas.gov, enter HR 847 in search bar and click the 'bill number' button, then search.); yet the health registry includes registrants from all 50 states.
Monday, March 30 2009 - 9/11 Consequences
More Than 20 Types Of War Crimes Against Children
Relationship to 9/11 truth? Do we really think Americans would allow, authorize, justify, or even overlook the torture of children in OUR name without the shock and awe of the 9/11 attacks and being perpetually pounded with the graphic memory? Remember when Bush legal advisor John Yoo was asked whether it's legal to crush the testicles of a child? (see video below)
(Human rights legal scholar and professor Doug) Cassel: If the president deems that he's got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person's child, there is no law that can stop him?Yoo: No treaty
Cassel: Also no law by Congress--that is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo...
Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that. Clearly, the President thought he needed to do a LOT of things in response to the 9/11 attacks. Many things, that is, other than fully investigating, testifying under oath, or holding anyone accountable. Now, the new President thinks he needs to do a LOT of things in response to 9/11, too. STILL, 9/11 is the reason. NOW, it is time to powerfully demand the truth from the mouths of those who continue to use the attacks as an excuse for anything and everything! This will NOT be done in our name while we remain silent...
More Than 20 Types Of War Crimes Against Children Ascribed To Ex-President Bush In Iraq And Afghanistan
Monday, 23 March 2009
Torture has received the most attention among the many war crimes of the Bush administration. But those who support Bush's pursuit of the "war on terror" have not been impressed by recriminations over torture. Worse than torture are the murders of at least 50 prisoners in Abu Ghraib, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo, but again the hard-hearted are unimpressed when those whom they perceive as terrorists receive illegal extrajudicial capital punishment.
The case for abusing children, however, is more difficult to support. The best kept secret of the Bush's war crimes is that thousands of children have been imprisoned, tortured, and otherwise denied rights under the Geneva Conventions and related international agreements. Yet both Congress and the media have strangely failed to identify the very existence of child prisoners as a war crime. In the Islamic world, however, there is no such silence. Indeed, the prophet Mohammed was the first to counsel warriors not to harm innocent children.
Monday, March 30 2009 - Fear Factors
This pattern's becoming quite clear ...
Notice any familiar pattern here, at all?
-Wednesday - "Britain warned of a growing terrorist risk from chemical, biological and radiological weapons and pinpointed al Qaeda in Pakistan"
-Friday, March 27 - Obama rolls out his "new" Afghanistan and Pakistan
-Sunday, March 29 - Newest "Be Very Afraid" alert hits the wires -- Threat of a Dirty Bomb "more likely than ever" for G20 leaders in London...
-Also Sunday, Washington Post announces torturing alleged al Qaeda #2 didn't foil any dastardly plots. (Pentagon Department of Information surely huddles to determine the best path to re-terrorize The People so they'll look past this little tidbit...)
-Also Sunday, Spain announces they'll go ahead with investigation of a "98-page complaint to prosecutors that accuses former Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and five others of being the legal architects of system that allowed torture." (After which the Obama legal team surely huddles to determine the best path so they can continue to 'look forward' while assuring The People that 'no one's above the law' ... 'really')
Articles follow. Are we convinced yet that "those people" are SO dangerous that we'll support sending another 21,000 US troops (plus mercenaries and civilian aid workers) into Afghanistan, and CIA drones into Pakistan, more rendition, more torture, more slaughter, or will it take a few more "dirty bomb" and "Anthrax" threats from the government to get us there? Really??? Are we even asking ourselves that question? Can we continue to overlook the illegal actions of this administration and nonrepresentational, slacking legislative branch? Since when did it become legal for "CIA drones" to bomb another country? Wasn't there something about a War Powers Act once...?
Do we see the government's pattern of issuing red alerts coincidental with announcing American hegemony-building war plans? Many people became clear about that while Bush was in power, but fewer are discussing it openly now that we have "new" leadership. So what about it? Can you talk with coworkers or friends about the absurdity of this, and counter the nationalist propaganda and fear-mongering strongly enough to speak out and stand up? Food for thought . . .
Monday, March 30 2009 - 9/11 Consequences
Obama Escalates War in Afghanistan; Threatens Expansion to Pakistan
by Kenneth J. Theisen
28 March 2009
President Barack Obama continued with his latest escalation of the war in Afghanistan
by announcing his plans to send an additional 4,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan
to train Afghan government puppet forces. He also announced plans to send hundreds
of diplomats and civilian officials to the country, in what Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton called an "integrated military-civilian strategy".
Like his predecessor George W. Bush, Obama raised the specter of "terrorism"
to justify his actions.
Monday, March 30 2009 - Legal Response to 9/11
Detainee's Harsh Treatment Foiled No Plots
Waterboarding, Rough Interrogation of Abu Zubaida Produced False Leads, Officials Say
By Peter Finn and Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, March 29, 2009; A01
When CIA officials subjected their first high-value captive, Abu Zubaida, to waterboarding and other harsh interrogation methods, they were convinced that they had in their custody an al-Qaeda leader who knew details of operations yet to be unleashed, and they were facing increasing pressure from the White House to get those secrets out of him.
The methods succeeded in breaking him, and the stories he told of al-Qaeda terrorism plots sent CIA officers around the globe chasing leads.
In the end, though, not a single significant plot was foiled as a result of Abu Zubaida's tortured confessions, according to former senior government officials who closely followed the interrogations. Nearly all of the leads attained through the harsh measures quickly evaporated, while most of the useful information from Abu Zubaida -- chiefly names of al-Qaeda members and associates -- was obtained before waterboarding was introduced, they said.
|home | about us | contact | research | grassroots | calendar | links | search|