Relationship to 9/11 truth? Do we really think Americans would allow, authorize, justify, or even overlook the torture of children in OUR name without the shock and awe of the 9/11 attacks and being perpetually pounded with the graphic memory? Remember when Bush legal advisor John Yoo was asked whether it’s legal to crush the testicles of a child? (see video below)

(Human rights legal scholar and professor Doug) Cassel: If the president deems that he’s got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person’s child, there is no law that can stop him?

Yoo: No treaty

Cassel: Also no law by Congress–that is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo…

Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that.

Clearly, the President thought he needed to do a LOT of things in response to the 9/11 attacks. Many things, that is, other than fully investigating, testifying under oath, or holding anyone accountable. Now, the new President thinks he needs to do a LOT of things in response to 9/11, too. STILL, 9/11 is the reason. NOW, it is time to powerfully demand the truth from the mouths of those who continue to use the attacks as an excuse for anything and everything! This will NOT be done in our name while we remain silent…