A Commitment to More Civil and Effective
Collaboration in the 9/11 Truth Movement
Because we still lack subpoena and discovery powers, members of the 9/11 truth
movement and American citizens as a whole will not be able to fully connect the
"dots" of 9/11 events until key classified documents and videos are
leaked or released. In the meantime, many of us will develop theories about those
events and what really occurred. Given the incompleteness of the facts at hand,
our theories will invariably differ. They therefore can and should be sincerely
discussed and analyzed, but this debate must not obscure the reality that the
investigative tasks we face still remain extremely challenging.
We believe our campaign to expose the truth of 9/11 offers the world more essential
insights into current political and economic reality than any other modern movement
and therefore can empower the most profound social transformation of our age.
This work is far too important to debilitate with egotism, zealotry or self-inflicted
wounds, and we must make every effort to sustain the unprecedented progress we
have made.
Because the 9/11 truth movement presents grave moral, legal and political threats
to those in power, we would be naïve to not anticipate covert governmental
intervention in our activities and attempts to divide, disrupt and discredit us
by promoting hateful or repellant theories and sowing internal discord. Indeed,
the greatest risk these forces pose to our work is not espionage or disinformation;
it is the provocation of destructive mistrust between authentic activists.
We the undersigned therefore commit ourselves to work together towards our
greater goals with the least possible rancor and internal strife. We agree to
reject ad hominem denunciations and attacks upon others' motives, and focus our
critical attention upon the logic, factual evidence and probability supporting
certain hypotheses instead. Our ultimate goal must be the full disclosure of 9/11
truth, which is disserved by factional warfare on behalf of partial points of
view. We will strive to fill in the gaps of the evidentiary record, so that facts
dictate our conclusions rather than conjecture or emotional charges and appeals.
Finally, since we ourselves must embody the societal changes we wish to see,
we vow to continue our work with fierce devotion, but also with mutual respect,
selflessness and above all, honesty.
|