Warrantless wiretap lawsuit dismissed citing national security


A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit Thursday against warantless wiretap programs established during the Bush administration, ruling that the court could not determine the plaintiff’s legal standing without endangering national security.

Politico reported that U.S. District Court Judge Jeffrey White dismissed a lawsuit originally filed in 2008 that argued that the Terrorist Surveillance Program set up by the NSA under President George W. Bush violated both the Fourth Amendment and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

White wrote in his ruling that allowing the case to proceed could have “devastating” consequences for U.S. national security, according to Politico.

“The Court cannot issue any determinative finding on the issue of whether or not Plaintiffs have standing without taking the risk that such a ruling may result in potentially devastating national security consequences,” he reportedly wrote.

In his ruling, White argued that plaintiffs could not determine whether or not the U.S. government had spied on their phone records without revealing state secrets.

Uncle sam, rendered in graffiti on brick wall, next to a payphone wiretapping your calls“The Ninth Circuit was not presented with the issue of what to do when, as here, the answer to the question of whether a particular plaintiff was subjected to surveillance … is the very information over which the Government seeks to assert the state secrets privilege,” he wrote, according to Politico.

The rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which brought the suit, vowed to repeal the ruling.

“We are disappointed that the case was dismissed on the basis of the government’s state secrecy arguments,” the group’s director Cindy Cohn told Politico.

“The American people deserve to know whether mass surveillance is legal and constitutional. Instead of proceeding to the legal merits of the government’s programs, the Court deferred to the government’s state secrecy arguments. We look forward to seeking review in the Ninth Circuit.”

SOURCEOriginally published at The Hill by John Bowden on 4/25/2019
Previous articleWe Were Lied to about 9-11: The Interviews
Next articlePoliticians Who Exploited First Responders for Political Gain Abandon Them in Time of Need

Since 2004, 911Truth.Org has educated the public about the suppressed realities of the September 11 attacks.

We worked with the 9/11 Families to pressure the Bush administration to convene an investigation into the deadliest attacks on US soil since Pearl Harbor. We attended many of the commission hearings and questioned commissioners and bird-dogged elected officials to get answers to the Unanswered Questions that remain so to this day.

We reported the contradictions, lies and omissions on the public record. 911Truth.Org staff have given hundreds of interviews on radio and mainstream network TV.

We cover a wide range of 9/11-related issues in publishing academic papers, original research, and opinion pieces.

We wish to thank our donors who have kept us on the web since 2004! We appreciate your continued support!

We continue to update the website to make the nearly 3000 articles easier to find, read and share. Thanks for visiting us!