Richard Gage, AIA Publicly Thanks FBI for Endorsement of ‘Controlled Demolition’ Analysis – bin Laden Still Not ‘Wanted’ for 9/11

We previously noted the FBI’s response to a letter from Saive here. Now, Gage publicly offers his assistance, and we hope that the FBI will honestly follow-up on their apparently receptive response.

Of course, we still wonder why the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists list, which puts Usama bin Laden at the top, still doesn’t list the 9/11 attacks as one of the crimes for which they list him as a terrorist … Long-time readers will recall that The Muckraker Report’s Ed Haas spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI in June 2006:

When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing statement, I asked, “How this was possible?” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” I asked, “How does that work?” Tomb continued, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.”