By Bernard Weiner
Co-Editor, The Crisis Papers
Each year around the anniversary of 9/11, I summarize what we ordinary citizens have learned since that awful day in 2001. This is the seventh annual look...
by Luke Ryland
September 5, 2008
LetSibelEdmondsSpeak.blogspot.com
In last Monday's New York Times, David Sanger and William Broad wrote a front-page article about the CIA's involvement in the nuclear black market.
The article demonstrates (again) that the New...
By Kathy Sanborn
13/08/08 "ICH" -- - Sanborn: When I read your article, "Marching Off Into Tyranny," I was impressed by how you were able to concisely sum up one of the most important issues...
This article is being posted at 911truth.org as a "service" to our readers, though not 9/11-specific, because many of us activists are connected almost exclusively through a variety of wireless devices. We need to be healthy and clear-thinking to do the grueling work we do, and the scientific and medical literature--especially from outside the US--is becoming more definitive in sounding alarms about dangers of EMF waves from all kinds of wireless devices. European countries are looking at bans on wireless modems in schools, for instance, and this link between cell phones and cancer is really quite undeniable now. Just last night I bought a replacement for my lost cell-phone earbud for about $6 (no, NOT at Walmart!). And really, while slightly less convenient than a wireless connection, the cost to run a cable from you router to your computer is equally negligible. I'll try to refrain from sounding like your mother here when it comes to the deadly effects of vaccinations and aspartame (PLEASE read about these anyway), but I do hope that each of us will look at what we need to do to take better care of ourselves so that we can continue to fight the good fight! We've still got an awful lot of work ahead of us. Janice
Posted by Reprehensor at 911blogger.com:
June 24, 2008
Ray McGovern
Ray McGovern's statement on the Alex Jones show (6/24) never got the attention
it deserved. For those who never caught the show or listened to the MP3, here
is what McGovern said;
"I'd be more interested in exploring how this thing could get underway.
Now, the Iranians are no dopes. They're not gonna be provoked into doing the
kind of attack on Israel or US forces that would give us an excuse, and the
Israelis an excuse to really zap 'em, and what I mean by really zap them is;
go after the lion's share of their nuclear-related activities in Iran.
And so what's likely to happen? Well, I think more likely than anything
would be a kind of, what we call in the trade here, in the intelligence trade,
a False Flag attack. Ok? You get a boat all painted up with Iranian colors,
and you sink a US destroyer escort in the gulf... wow! You kill a bunch of
Americans... that could set things off.
Now who would do that? Who has an interest? Cui bono? We used to say. Who
would have an interest, who would profit from that kind of thing? It's very
clear that the state of Israel would, because many of those extreme leaders
think that they have to move against Iran before Bush leaves office."
Until very recently, McGovern has been one of the most restrained voices when
it comes to talking about False Flag attacks. As the most vocal and visible
member of the VIPS, McGovern's prudence has earned a respected position in the
anti-war and impeachment movements in the U.S.
As a former high-level intelligence official, who delivered the President's
Daily Brief on more than one occasion, he would know exactly what a False Flag
operation is. McGovern is running up a warning flag right now. Considering his
track record of 100% on Iraq's WMDs... it wouldn't be prudent, (not at this
juncture), to ignore his warning now.
Two hard-hitting pieces from McGovern follow:
by Paul Craig Roberts
July 17, 2008
National Public Radio has been spending much news time on Darfur in Western Sudan where a great deal of human suffering and death are occurring. The military conflict has...
