Scientists for 9/11 Truth and the International Center for 9/11 Studies will be sponsoring a “Conference on the 9/11 Pentagon Evidence” on May 4 in Denver, Colorado. Co-sponsors: Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance and 911truth.Org.
The 9/11 Truth Movement’s strongest and most rigorously verified evidence-based theory is the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center.
By contrast, the Truth Movement’s most contentious and divisive issue has been the question of what happened at the Pentagon. The early study of the Pentagon was plagued by lack of information and misinformation, much of which has persisted. But even though we now have more evidence, most current theories fail to address the full range of evidence, especially that which supports large plane impact. Why? For all of us, anchoring and confirmation bias make it hard to let go of initial impressions. The scientific method requires us to challenge our biases as we seek truth.
New evidence has come to light regarding the Pentagon attack. I think you will find it interesting to learn more about why these scientists find it imperative to share their latest research.
If you would like to know more about the historic upcoming Denver May 4th “Conference on the 9/11 Pentagon Evidence,” please listen to Dr. Kevin Barrett’s interview of physics teacher David Chandler at this link.Link to Dr. Kevin Barrett’s Patreon page for interview with David Chandler.
A key word for this conference is “evidence.” Addressing all of the currently known relevant evidence is a crucial component of the scientific process – a process in which anyone can participate. The goal is to put all of the evidence on the table, not to end discussion, but to be the basis for ongoing discussion. We believe the current evidence supports large plane impact of the Pentagon. Scientific conclusions remain fluid, however, so all research remains open to critique.
The goals of this conference are to present current evidence that any viable theory must address and to put the discussion of what happened at the Pentagon on a solid scientific footing to make our movement as strong as possible. If the Truth Movement ever gets real traction in a court of law or with society at large, we will be attacked at our weakest point. Our adversaries are very powerful and have the media at their beck and call. If we are shown to be in disarray on such a major issue as the Pentagon, our good work proving demolition at the World Trade Center might well be ignored. Thus we welcome your participation in this conference and your questions as we continue in the search for truth.
The invited speakers at this event are, in alphabetical order, David Chandler, Wayne Coste, Ken Jenkins, Warren Stutt, and John D. Wyndham, all of whom have done active scientific research on the evidence at the Pentagon. We invite you to join us in Denver on May 4 and/or help us defray the costs by contributing financially through our GoFundMe account. The event will be videotaped.
University Park United Methodist Church (East Fellowship Hall)
2180 S University Blvd, Denver, CO 80210
May 4, 2019: 9:30 am – 5:00 pm
Tickets for the event are available at Eventbrite.
Please contribute if this event is meaningful for you.
GoFundMe — https://www.gofundme.com/conference-on-the-911-pentagon-evidence
Download the event flyer.
Presenters and their 9/11 Pentagon Evidence Research
David Chandler; BS (IPS) Physics/Engineering, Harvey Mudd College; MA Education, Claremont Graduate University; MS Mathematics, California Polytechnic University; Coordinator, Scientists for 9/11 Truth; Board, International Center for 9/11 Studies
A Joint Statement on the Pentagon (with Jonathan Cole)
Pentagon Plane Puzzle + Going Beyond Speculation (with Ken Jenkins)
The Pentagon Attack on 9/11: A Refutation of the Pentagon Flyover Hypothesis Based on Analysis of the Flight Path and Addendum (with Frank Legge)
Critique of CIT’s Fundamentally Flawed Methodology
Blink Comparator Views of the Plane at the Pentagon
Wayne Coste; BS Electrical Engineering, University of Connecticut
Explanation of the Evidence at the Pentagon on 9/11 – Answering the 9/11 Consensus Panel Challenge
Ken Jenkins; BS Electrical Engineering, Carnegie-Mellon University; Post graduate studies, Psychology
Pentagon Plane Puzzle + Going Beyond Speculation (with David Chandler)
The Truth is Not Enough: How to Overcome Emotional Barriers to 9/11 Truth
The 85 Pentagon Area Surveillance Cameras
Why Not Use a Plane? — Fake vs. Real Events (with Frank Legge)
Warren Stutt; BSc (Hons) Comp. Sci., Auckland University
Flight AA77 on 9/11: New FDR Analysis Supports the Official Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon (with Frank Legge)
A Response to Pilots for 9/11 Truth (with Frank Legge)
John D. Wyndham; PhD Physics, Cambridge University (U.K.); Board, Scientists for 9/11 Truth
Bringing Closure to the 9/11 Pentagon Debate
The Pentagon Event: The Honegger Hypothesis Refuted, Ver 2 (with Victoria Ashley, David Chandler, Jonathan H. Cole, Jim Hoffman, Ken Jenkins, Frank Legge)
The Pentagon Attack: Eyewitnesses, Debris Flow and Other Issues – A Reply to Fletcher and Eastman
The Pentagon Attack: The Event Time Revisited
The Pentagon Attack: Problems with Theories Alternative to Large Plane Impact