by Prof. Peter Dale Scott
Global Research
" In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential...
by Prof. Peter Dale Scott
June 10, 2009
GlobalResearch.ca
In his remarkable speech at Cairo University on June 4, President Obama promised "a new beginning." In the words of the Israeli commentator Uri Avnery, the speech offered...
On Friday, May 29, we sent out our May "Truth Advocate," reprinted here for your convenience and ease of reading. If you do not receive our occasional newsletter and would like to, subscribe here. If you are subscribed but didn't receive the email, please check your spam filter for "info [at] 911truth.org." Please forward this link around (or the original emailed newsletter) to further promote the amazing amount of important 9/11 and related news published in the last month. And please use the calendar (upper right block of our front page) to promote your 9/11-related events to a wider audience. Thank you.
Intro from Jon Gold: Where to begin... First of all, James Ridgway is treating Cheney's
"own account" as proof he arrived at the PEOC "shortly before
10:00 a.m." Which account is he referring to? It couldn't be this recent
one from the same
speech James is referencing. That account says, "when radar caught
sight of an airliner heading toward the White House at 500 miles an hour. That
was Flight 77" ... "With the plane still inbound,
Secret Service agents came into my office and said we had to leave, now. A
few moments later I found myself in a fortified White House command
post somewhere down below."
Flight 93 never came within 50, 30, or 10 miles of Washington D.C. (as Mineta
states the "young man" was reporting to Cheney) so the plane the "young
man" was referring to, according to Mineta, was in fact Flight 77.
Anyway... as James points out, shoot-down orders weren't issued by Cheney until
10:18. If Cheney was in the bunker before the Pentagon was hit, and the conversation
between the "young man" and Cheney (referenced by Mineta) took place
at 9:25, then what orders were they? Why did the "young man" question
them by asking "do the orders still stand?" Why was that "young
man" never named? Why was he never brought before the 9/11 Commission to
testify? If the conversation that took place between the "young man"
and Cheney took place at 9:25, and referenced already given orders, than those
orders were given before 9:25.
What orders were they?
Note: See this related piece from Peter Dale Scott, posted Friday,
5/22, 2009:
Peter Dale Scott
911Truth.org
Here is an excerpt from the text of what Cheney said at the American Enterprise Institute on May 21, 2009:
"For me, one of the defining experiences was the morning of...
The US's political discourse and foreign policy in recent years has been based on the assumption that Osama bin Laden is still alive. George W. Bush promised as president that he would get Osama...
